What Are Biofilms?
Biofilms are adhesive polymeric structures formed by microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi in specific environments. These communities are embedded in a self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), including polysaccharides, proteins, and DNA. Biofilms provide structural support and protection to the microbes within, making them highly resistant to antibiotics and immune system attacks.
Stages of Biofilm Formation:
- Initial Attachment: Microorganisms reversibly adhere to a surface
- Irreversible Attachment: They secrete EPS, solidifying their grip.
- Maturation: A three-dimensional structure develops as the colony grows.
- Dispersion: Portions of the colony detach and spread to colonize new surfaces
Health Impacts of Biofilms
Biofilms pose serious challenges in both medical and everyday contexts:
‧ Chronic Infections: Conditions like chronic sinusitis, periodontitis, and urinary tract infections are often linked to biofilms. These infections are persistent due to biofilms’ ability to shield pathogens from treatment.
‧ Medical Device Contamination: Devices such as catheters and prosthetics are susceptible to biofilm formation, increasing infection risk.
‧ Increased Antibiotic Resistance: Microbes within biofilms can be 10 to 1000 times more resistant to antibiotics, contributing significantly to the global antibiotic resistance crisis.
Nattokinase: A Natural Enzyme with Biofilm-Disrupting Potential
Nattokinase is a proteolytic enzyme derived from the fermentation of soybeans (natto) by Bacillus subtilis. While widely recognized for its fibrinolytic and cardiovascular-supportive properties, there is growing interest in its broader physiological effects—including potential roles in addressing biofilm-associated complications.
Possible Mechanisms of Action in Biofilm Management:
Mechanism
| Evidence snapshot
| Why it matters |
Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) cleavage | Nattokinase (200 FU mL⁻¹) cut Staphylococcus aureus device-biofilm biomass 46 % vs. control (p<0.01). | Confirms direct matrix weakening. |
Synergy with antibiotics | nattokinase + rifampin or ciprofloxacin produced a 2-log greater kill vs. antibiotic alone in mature S. aureus biofilms. | Suggests enzyme-plus-drug regimens may restore antibiotic potency. |
Surface pre-treatment | 1-h Nattokinase soaks on silicone catheters reduced Pseudomonas aeruginosa initial adhesion 38 % in a flow-cell model. | Points to future device-care applications. |
While these potential applications are not yet fully validated in clinical or in vivo biofilm contexts, the biochemical characteristics of nattokinase make it a candidate of interest in ongoing investigations into natural biofilm-modulating strategies.
Key Takeaways
Biofilms represent a formidable biological defense system for harmful microbes, contributing to persistent infections and antimicrobial resistance. While conventional treatments often struggle to overcome these structures, nattokinase offers a natural and promising strategy to break down biofilms. Its application could revolutionize approaches to chronic infection management, oral health, and medical device safety — making it a target of increasing interest in both biomedical research and integrative health care.
FAQ
Q: Can nattokinase replace antibiotics for chronic biofilm infections?
A: No. Early studies show synergy, not substitution. Use NK alongside physician-prescribed antimicrobials and device-cleaning protocols.
Q: Is oral nattokinase enough to reach dental or sinus biofilms?
A: Systemic Nattokinase may help reduce circulating fibrin but local delivery (irrigation, mouthwash) is being explored for site-specific impact.
Q:
Are there risks of bleeding when using NK topically?
A: Topical or device-soak concentrations are unlikely to affect systemic clotting, but anyone on anticoagulants should still consult a healthcare provider.
References
Costerton et al., “ Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. ”, 1999 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318)
Donlan et al., “Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerging Infectious Diseases.”, 2001 (doi: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0702.010226)
Mah et al., “Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents.”, 2001 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2)
Hogan et al., “Novel Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Device-Related Infections Using Fibrinolytic Agents.”, 2018 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.02008-17)
Lin et al., “ Bacillus subtilis natto Derivatives Inhibit Enterococcal Biofilm Formation via Restructuring of the Cell Envelope.”, 2021 (doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.785351)